Pepinio Posted December 1, 2018 Posted December 1, 2018 Moin, gerade gelesen das @Humledrik schreibt [ I still think this campaign is FUBAR.] , diese Campaign sei schrecklich. Ist das so ? habe ja kein vergleich. Also klar gibt's technisch und spielerisch das ein oder andere Problem , doch ist es wirklich so schlimm ? Quote
Humledrik Posted December 1, 2018 Posted December 1, 2018 (edited) Moin Pepino. Mein deutsch ist sehr scheisse so in English. (I understand a lot of written German but am very bad at writing and speaking it myself) The campaign per se is not FUBAR. But the team composition IS. Until it's fixed permanently so one side does not have most of the best players, it will continue to be FUBAR. Campaign design etc there is nothing wrong with in general, apart from a few imbalances like Japanese overpowered MG compared to BAR and the knee mortars., whereas only spotter kit on Allied gets Garand and number of grenades for assault is just rubbish. Maps are great., apart from foliage being an issue when many players are using low settings. For future campaigns it is ESSENTIAL that the best players are better distributed over the two sides, or it is just no fun for anyone. Edited December 1, 2018 by Humledrik 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.